Connecticut

  Civil Rights Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Civil-Right
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Connecticut Civil Rights News

 

Ohio Public Defender Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Challenging Ohio’s Lethal Injection Procedure

(Columbus)—

The Office of the Ohio Public Defender (OPD) yesterday filed a civil rights lawsuit in the Federal Southern District Court of Ohio challenging the constitutionality of Ohio’s lethal injection protocol. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two Ohio death row inmates, Adremy Dennis and Richard W. Cooey, II.

Ohio’s lethal injection protocol includes a short-term anesthetic and a paralyzing drug, which could combine to leave an inmate conscious but paralyzed, trapping him in a chemical tomb that hides the excruciatingly painful effects of death by suffocation and heart attack. Veterinarians forbid using the same combination of drugs for euthanizing pets, in order to avoid inflicting pain on animals. At bare minimum, the OPD argues that we as a civilized society should not be executing human beings by using drugs veterinarians won’t use to put pets to sleep.

In the lawsuit filed yesterday, the OPD argues that the use of the paralyzing drug, pancuronium bromide, is a violation of Dennis’ and Cooey’s rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution: "[Ohio’s] current method of lethal injection can and will, in effect, cause them to be tortured to death. No government within the United States can intentionally or negligently use an arbitrary, cruel, and/or unreliable method of execution."

The lawsuit goes on to argue that Ohio’s "lethal injection protocol includes an unreliable ultrashort-acting anesthetic that can and will leave [Dennis and Cooey] conscious but trapped in a paralyzed body wracked with the pain of suffocation and a heart attack. [The State of Ohio] intend[s] to execute [Dennis and Cooey] with unreliable and arbitrary drugs, administered by inadequately trained personnel, who use inappropriate equipment and methods to cause death by lethal injection."

Earlier this year, the OPD filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of Lewis Williams and John Glenn Roe. Due to then-existing technicalities, that lawsuit was dismissed without any rulings on the facts, and both Williams and Roe were executed. The OPD believes that the technical barriers to challenging Ohio lethal injection methods were effectively lifted by the United States Supreme Court’s decision on May 24, 2004 in Nelson v. Campbell, where the Court allowed an Alabama death-row inmate to use the civil rights statute to challenge lethal injection procedures.

Contact a Connecticut civil rights lawyer today and get a free consultation!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Adjustments and changes an employer must make in the work schedule or work environment to meet the needs of his employees.


 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Civil Rights cases in Connecticut and nationwide:

Rep. Watson & Black Caucus Members Register Outrage Over Blatant Discrimination By Cherokee Nation
Congresswoman Diane E. Watson and 25 members of the Congressional Black Caucus have sent a letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs protesting the re...
Read more >


Accused Sex Trafficker Arraigned in Federal Court
Consuelo Carreto-Valencia, an accused sex trafficker extradited to the United States from Mexico in January, was arraigned today in federal court o...
Read more >


National African American History Month, 2007
African Americans have been an integral part of America for generations, and our Nation is stronger because of their contributions. During Nat...
Read more >


More Civil Rights News >

 
 

Civil Rights Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Underrepresention

Definition:
Inadequately represented in the work force of a particular activity. This term is used to describe the extent to which women, minorities, and persons with disabilities are represented in particular grade levels and job categories.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Definition:
Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166) (CRA) amends several sections of Title VII. These amendments appear in boldface type. In addition, section 102 of the CRA (which is printed elsewhere in this publication) amends the Revised Statutes by adding a new section following section 1977 (42 U.S.C. 1981), to provide for the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages in cases of intentional violations of Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Cross references to Title VII as enacted appear in italics following each section heading.

Class Complaint/Class Action

Definition:
A complaint articulated or filed by a group of people who feel that personnel or management policies or practices discriminate against them as a group. Members of the group believe that a characteristic they share -- race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability is the basis for the discrimination.

More Civil Rights Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Search Site:

 
 

Civil Rights Resources

 


Search Civil Rights resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

Civil Rights Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Civil Rights:

  • Criminal Justice
  • Death Penalty
  • Disability Rights
  • Drug Policy
  • Free Speech

More Civil Rights Topics >

Connecticut Civil-Right Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Civil-Right attorney you should contact our Civil-Right Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Branford
  • Bridgeport
  • Bristol
  • Cheshire
  • Danbury
  • East Hartford
  • East Haven
  • Enfield
  • Fairfield
  • Glastonbury
  • Greenwich
  • Groton
  • Guilford
  • Hamden
  • Hartford
  • Manchester
  • Meriden
  • Middletown
  • Milford
  • Naugatuck
  • New Britain
  • New Haven
  • New London
  • New Milford
  • Newington
  • North Haven
  • Norwalk
  • Norwich
  • Ridgefield
  • Shelton
  • South Windsor
  • Southington
  • Stamford
  • Stratford
  • Torrington
  • Trumbull
  • Vernon Rockville
  • Wallingford
  • Waterbury
  • West Haven
  • Westport
  • Wethersfield
  • Windsor
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Connecticut Civil Rights Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.